and after reading about a paragraph of reading it and not understanding any of it I was like
But when I actually sat down and read it I began to agree
more and more with Devitt. She talks about how the idea of genre could be
extremely boring based on how it is taught. In high school I remember being
taught genre in a way that was extremely repetitive and formulaic because of
the different outlines I was forced to memorize just so I could write the
essays the way my teachers thought was best. Devitt fears that because of the
way genre is taught, people will succumb to writing the same way everyone else
was taught. She fears that because people don’t have genre awareness and are
not immersed and participating in genre that people will assimilate into using the
same formula of writing everyone has been using since elementary school.
Devitt states that "explicit genre teaching" can
be very limiting and that genre could be taught in better ways that are more
expansive and engaging. This is where I found it interesting that she
mentions five – paragraph essays, and how teaching them have many pros and
cons. After writing the same five paragraph essays the same way for four years,
I found myself struggling with classes that required me to write journals, lab
reports, or creative narratives. I always thought there were specific ways of
writing each. Every time I tried to write something I immediately thought I was
doing it wrong, or that it sounded too much like a formative essay. There was
also a teacher I had in high school that made us memorize 15 different vocabulary
words every week, quizzed us on them, and removed points from our essays if we didn’t
use any. She also made us write journals, which I thought was going to be fun.
But in the end, she told us to just copy a piece of text and analyze it. After
taking her class, I decided that I did not want to be an English major and I
did not want to take a writing class. (If you couldn’t tell, I hated this
teacher). Anyways, like Devitt said I think that explicitly teaching genre a
certain way can limit a persons writing and genre awareness.
All in
all, I agreed with most of Devitts points. I believe that in todays education
system, teachers could make writing so much easier and less boring if topics
such as genre were taught in different ways rather than just teaching the same
five paragraph essay. Though it is important, I feel like expanding writing
genres will open new doors to many people, like inspiring people to write
music, poetry, books, or even just allowing them to feel comfortable writing in
a journal. After reading Devitts article, I think (hopefully) ill be a lot more
attentive to different genres I may come across and think about the different genres
I might want to include in my own writing.


Hello Joan, I feel you with your introduction. When I first saw how long the article was I also felt the same way. But ones you start reading the article it does become more interesting, many difficult words that I had to googled, but still an interesting article. I agree with you that we all take a different identity when we type any kind of writing. We use different formats and word choices when we speak to our friends in person and/or text. That differs a lot when sending an email to a professor too. Since you also agree that our writing genres skills should evolve into something else, what do you suggest we should do? And do you also think that this way of writing is also holding us back from expressing different ideas? Just like Devitt mentions? I think what I would change is having a ceratin length because some people can express an idea in less words than others. Sometimes a length isn’t necessary or any format. I feel that one should write until they think that the main idea of an essay has been express to its finest. I think I would change that. Looking forward to hearing what you would do different :)
ReplyDelete-joshyo arredondo
Yay, gifs! Now I can pay better attention! It’s fun being a visual learner. Yeah girl, same about the article length. I know what to read if I need a good nap (sorry Professor). These gifs are great, oh my god. I do agree with writing being taught as a very formulaic thing. I do some of my best writing when I’m not limited by any kind of formula or set of rules. I also agree that it causes kids to lose interest in what it is they’re writing and begin to write like robots because that’s what they think their teachers want. I think we can all agree there needs to be changes in the way different subjects are taught in school, especially when it comes to writing. I started hating writing because of how many stupid essays I had to write in high school and their sets of rules. -Alex DeMarco
ReplyDeleteTotally. I really did appreciate those gifs.
DeleteAnd no apologies necessary. The first time I assigned the reading, I did feel bad, but I don't anymore. I just freely acknowledge it's long and mostly boring. EF
I love the way you started your blog! I can relate! Anyway, reading your blog definitely helped me understand the Devitt article more. It took me such a long time to read the article and I'm still not sure I understood it! :( But I totally get what you mean when you said we learn how to write essays and paper a certain way for many years and then when you're told to just creatively write, you're not sure what to do or how to do it! I agreed when you said that genre dictates the way it is written. I was thinking something similar to that in that the genre influences how we perceive it and/or respond to it. It almost sets a tone for the audience in the same scary movies start out with a dark scene. Genre awareness is important, as you mentioned, because it pushes us to try a different style instead of just observing.
ReplyDelete--Victoria
I lol'd at your gifs! I have a similar one on my blog too, with Selena Gomez memes! At first I thought this blog would be a piece of cake, but then I pulled up the blog and I saw how long it was and my face was exactly like that woman's face. Wow, after I read your blog, I really got the idea of what Amy Devitt was really trying to say. You analyzed the text really well, and I concur with all of your points! I also agree with you when you said that teachers could make English classes way less boring by introducing a variety of literary genres. That's why I like this class, cause we get to do blogs (way more fun right?) I like how you incorporated texting in this blog because a lot of people do not realize that this a type of literary genre! It is crazy how people will switch up their language with a certain person depending on their setting. I can see why you wanted to be an English major! Good Job :-)
ReplyDeleteSee you in class!
Vanessa
Hey Jam!
ReplyDeleteI always enjoy reading your blog because you always put some humor into it. I liked the use of gifs in the beginning of your post, it really made me laugh. Your analysis of what Devitt was trying to say was really insightful and helped me understand Devitt's original writing. Just like you, I had a teacher in high school that made the class do a lot unnecessary busy work that I felt didn't really help me to improve my writing skills. There was a lot of structure in the class and I feel like I didn't grow as a writer at all because every single piece of writing was the same, with a set formula that we were supposed to use with every work we had to turn in. Thankfully our RWS class encourages a little more creativity than the previous classes we have taken!
- Julianna Duque
Wow. I'm so sorry for that English class. We had no formulas when I was in high school English, but I did hate analyzing literature. I ran as far as I could from it. And then I did my undergrad in creative writing. Hopefully you will rediscover a love of writing. At least a little bit. EF
ReplyDelete