DISCOURSE COMMUNITIES! Woo. The party don’t start
til discourse communities are brought in
(If you couldn’t tell, this is a very, very pained
smile.)
Hey, its been a while since we’ve written a blog. I
would say its good to be back but that would be a lie because I didn’t really
miss it all that much. I never know what to write, especially when the topics are
about genre or discourse communities. And it was even harder when I saw the
article the blog was based on. I tried reading Swales but it was so hard to
even pay attention. Did anyone else have a hard time reading this or was it
just me? The first attempt at me reading it was basically just me making this
face the entire time.
The sentences were so long and boring my mind
started to drift from what he was actually talking about. Why do academic authors like this always feel the need to fluff
up sentences to the point where I get lost and don’t even remember what the
point is? Can’t they just get straight to the point? But after realizing I had
no choice, I forced myself to read. And after reading the same paragraphs about
10 times, I guess I finally started to get what he was trying to say. Swales begins the article by introducing
speech community; a community that shares the knowledge of rules for the
conduct and interpretation of speech. Swales then talks about how a speech
community is built through birth, accident, or adoption and then contrasts this idea by introducing discourse community, which
he says uses persuasion and training to recruit members.
He introduces
the idea of discourse community by using six characteristics that each discourse
community holds. The six characteristics he included are: 1) a discourse
community has a broadly agreed set of common public goals. 2) A discourse
community has mechanisms of intercommunication among its members. 3) A
discourse community uses its participatory mechanisms primarily to provide
information and feedback. 4) A discourse community utilizes and hence possesses
one or more genres in the communicative furtherance of its aims. 5) In addition
to owning genres, a discourse community has acquired some specific lexis. 6) A
discourse community has a threshold level of members with a suitable degree of
relevant content and discoursal expertise.
So the characteristics
themselves are pretty self explanatory. But I’m gonna explain them anyways so I
have more to talk about lol So, a discourse community have common goals, okay
cool that’s number 1. Number 2, a discourse community has ways to communicate
between the people who are part of it. Number 3, a discourse community uses its
many ways of communication to provide information to its members. Number 4, a
discourse community has many different genres tied to it. Number 5, a discourse
community has specific language. And number 6, a discourse community has
different levels of membership. Did anyone notice in the article that it says “individuals
enter as apprentices and leave by death or in other
less involuntary ways”? Leave by death? Kinda intense for something like a discourse community haha but anyways, simplifying
Swales characteristics helped me understand the concept of discourse communities
a lot better. Hopefully my explanations helped anyone else struggling with this
article!
I guess the best
way to fully understand discourse communities to analyze one that I’m actually
part of; College students. Our goal is basically just to pass all our classes
with decent grades and hopefully graduate within 4 or 5 years. And also try not
to cry too much about hard adulating is. Or how much sleep we didn’t get. Or how much
money we wish we had. Where was this going again? Oh yeah, discourse community.
We also communicate through a bunch of different ways, whether its through
class, social media, or any clubs we may be affiliated with. Talk about how
much we hate waking up for 8ams or how certain exams make us feel like we
dishonored our families is frequent. We provide information by sharing different
information about classes we may have taken together or have taken before. We
share thoughts on places like ratemyprofessor or facebook groups. Our language
differs between specific groups, but they usually consist of slang and
inappropriate language. As college students we have different “thresholds”
through the number of years we’ve been here. We could be freshman, or we could
be seniors.
Has this reached
750 words yet? Yes? Okay cool because I’m done. Til next time!


Hey!!
ReplyDeleteWell funny thing you mentioning how you decided to tackle the article. I totally dismissed it not wanting to get completely confused! haha. I saw the it said the reading was optional so I just looked at my notes in class. So i applaud you for actually taking the time to read it. Nice work on your blog. It was funny yet informative. I never really thought of college students being a discourse community but I think you are totally correct!!
See you in class,
Allison Starr
I also attempted to read the article but decided that a light skim would have to suffice. I really like the way you introduced this blog by using relatable memes. I saw the meme of Andy from the office and that's mainly what convinced me to read the rest of the piece. It was cool that you attempted to explain the six defining characteristics in a more understandable way that any random person would be able to pick up on, instead of the complicated language that Swales uses. I had never really thought of college students as a discourse community, as that is such a broad demographic, but your explanation makes sense. We are all such different people, yet are here for many of the same reasons and use communication to connect and collaborate.
ReplyDelete-Sam Spoden
I know college students have some characteristics of a discourse community, but I don't think they meet all six of the characteristics given that it isn't really a cohesive group with functional interaction except at a micro level. Thus we could say that some student groups function as discourse communities. EF
ReplyDelete